Last edited by Nir
Saturday, July 18, 2020 | History

3 edition of Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study found in the catalog.

Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study

Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study

Phase 2, evaluating success : Appendix F, project summaries

  • 47 Want to read
  • 26 Currently reading

Published by Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program in Lacey, WA .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Wetland mitigation -- Washington (State) -- Evaluation,
  • Wetland conservation -- Washington (State)

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesAppendix F, project summaries, Wetland mitigation study, phase 2, evaluating success
    StatementDana L. Mock ... [et al.].
    SeriesPublication -- no. 02-06-010, Publication (Washington (State). Dept. of Ecology) -- no. 02-06-010.
    ContributionsMock, Dana L., Washington (State). Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program.
    The Physical Object
    Paginationii, 128 p. ;
    Number of Pages128
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL14524841M
    OCLC/WorldCa49391737

    Washington State Exotics Expedition A Rapid Survey of Exotic Species in the Shallow Waters of Elliott Bay, Totten and Eld Inlets, and Willapa Bay. For the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Lacey, WA. . The Ontario Wetland Evaluation System (OWES) is a science-based system that outlines a process and a set of criteria to define, identify, and assess the functions and values of wetlands and rank them relative to one another. Case Study—Washington State Rapid Assessment Methods. Thomas Hruby. Pages Abstract. The state of.

    > Agency filings affecting this section. PDFWAC Wetlands. (1) The wetlands of Washington state are fragile ecosystems that serve a number of important beneficial functions. Wetlands assist in reducing erosion, siltation, flooding, ground and surface water pollution, and provide wildlife. 5. Mitigation Site Choose from the following: At Site of Impact (on-site), Within Project Limits (on-site), Off-Site, Wetland Bank Site, Accumulation, Don't Know. 6. Mitigation Basin Choose from the following: In Basin, Out of Basin, Don't Know. 7. Local Contact Person Enter name of contact person. Telephone # Enter telephone Size: 99KB.

    wetland), scr ub-shrub, forested, flats/unvegetated wet soils (unconsolidated-shore wetland), and open water. Common types of wetlands in Wisconsin include swamps, marshes, and peatlands. State Definition(s) of Wetlands "Wetland” is defined by state statute as “an area where water is at, near or above the land surface longFile Size: KB. North Dakota State University, February Economic Assessment of Wetland Mitigation in Minnesota. Major Professor: Dr. Jay A. Leitch. The economic efficiency of wetland mitigation in Minnesota’s Red River Valley was examined using the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method on ten wetland case studies to.


Share this book
You might also like
Horace Bushnell

Horace Bushnell

Tobacco research laboratory.

Tobacco research laboratory.

Reconfigurable Processor Array A Bit Sliced Parallel Computer (USA)

Reconfigurable Processor Array A Bit Sliced Parallel Computer (USA)

Russian architecture of the Soviet period

Russian architecture of the Soviet period

Assigning, responding, evaluating

Assigning, responding, evaluating

Selected state tax rates in the U.S.

Selected state tax rates in the U.S.

Metaphor and metonymy

Metaphor and metonymy

The bomb

The bomb

Furthering the neutrality policy of the United States.

Furthering the neutrality policy of the United States.

Dump-point inspection handbook.

Dump-point inspection handbook.

Efik proverbs and their ethical implications

Efik proverbs and their ethical implications

The three of us

The three of us

Orienteering

Orienteering

Index of courses

Index of courses

Supplement to senate journal, Sixty-fourth Legislature, regular session, June 2, 1975

Supplement to senate journal, Sixty-fourth Legislature, regular session, June 2, 1975

Tragedy of X

Tragedy of X

Asymptotic approximations

Asymptotic approximations

The exhaustion breakthrough

The exhaustion breakthrough

Civil affairs studies ...

Civil affairs studies ...

Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study Download PDF EPUB FB2

Author(s) Patricia Johnson, Dana L. Mock, Andy McMillan, Lauren Driscoll, Tom Hruby: Description: The Washington State Wetland Mitigation Evaluation Study was developed in two phases to evaluate the success of projects intended to compensate (mitigate) for wetlands lost to development activities in the state of Washington.

Washington State Wetland Mitigation Evaluation Study Phase 1: Compliance Patricia A. Johnson1, Dana L. Mock2, Emily J. Teachout3, and Andy McMillan1.

1Washington State Department of Ecology Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program, Lacey, Size: KB. The state's wetland program goal is to achieve a no-overall-net loss in the amount (acreage) and function of Washington's remaining wetlands. The program also aims to increase the quantity and quality of Washington's wetlands resource base.

We meet these goals, in part, through strategies designed to avoid, minimize, and compensate or mitigate. This is Appendix F to the Washington State Wetland Mitigation Evaluation Study - Phase 2: Evaluating Success (see Related Publications below). The Appendix provides a summary for each of the projects evaluated in the study.

REQUEST A COPY: The mission of the Department of Ecology is to protect, preserve, and enhance Washington’s environment. We protect and manage wetlands through multiple state laws, which define our regulatory authority.

Irrigation-influenced wetlands. Prior converted croplands. Local regulations. Federal regulations. We provide resources to landowners and developers to help with wetland mitigation planning.

Avoidance & minimization. Interagency guidance. State Wetland Protection: Status, Trends & Model Approaches A state study by the Environmental Law Institute With support from the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency. State Wetland Program Evaluation: Phase I, which evaluated 12 state programs was released in and ELI will profile the remaining states in two additional phases, anticipated for completion in This study is made possible by a grant.

The Wetland Program Development Grants (WPDGs) are the primary mechanism through which EPA supports state and tribal efforts to build programs that protect valuable wetland resources. The WPDG program was initiated in to provide states and tribes an opportunity to carry out projects to develop and refine comprehensive wetland programs.

7. Environmental Law Institute, National Wetland Mitigation Banking Study, Wetland Mitigation Banking, IWR Report WMB-6 (Alexandria, Virginia: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Support Center, Institute for Water Resources, February ), 8.

This document was prepared to guide the monitoring of wetland mitigation projects developed by the Washington State Department of Transportation. Monitoring is necessary to assess the development of wetland characteristics and functions and to determine whether the objectives of the mitigation project are met or, if not, how they might be met.

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mitigation Banking in Florida: Ecological Success and Compliance with Permit Criteria Kelly Chinners Reiss1, Erica Hernandez2, Mark T. Brown1 1Howard T. Odum Center for Wetlands University of FloridaFile Size: 2MB. Washington State Wetland Mitigation Evaluation Study.

Phase 1. Compliance. Publ. 00–06– Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: / Gleaning lessons from the mixed results of mitigation efforts to date, the book offers 10 practical guidelines for. Mitigation banking is the preservation, enhancement, restoration or creation (PERC) of a wetland, stream, or habitat conservation area which offsets, or compensates for, expected adverse impacts to similar nearby goal is to replace the exact function and value of specific habitats (i.e.

biodiversity, or other ecosystem services) that would be adversely affected by a proposed. Washington, DC EPA R March Methods for evaluating wetland condition This purpose was to be accomplished by providing a series of “state of the science” modules concerning The State of Wetland Science 4.

Study Design for Monitoring Wetlands 5. Administrative Framework for the Implementation of a. Access information about wetland areas. Upland Environment Designation Conversion. It is a policy of this Master Program that wetland areas seaward of the existing dikes on Smith Island, Port Susan Bay (north of the midpoint of Township 31) and Skagit Bay will be automatically transferred to the Rural Environment from the Conservancy Environment (subject to the standards for determining.

Author(s) Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Seattle District), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Region 10) Description: This document contains all of the comments that the agencies received during the public review of the draft Guidance on Wetland Mitigation in.

Inthe Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) acquired acres directly north of Tarlatt Slough for use as a wetland mitigation site. The Tarlatt Slough Mitigation Site is located at the southern end of Willapa Bay (See Figure 1).

The site is bounded. 80 Wetland Mitigation, Volume 2: A Guidebook for Airports planning, even if those viewpoints were not incorporated into the final project description or mitigation design. Benefits of Stakeholder Involvement The diverse perspectives presented through stakeholder involvement can lead to long-lasting benefits to airport operators, regulatory.

State Wetland Program Plan. Washington does not have a state wetland program plan at this time; however, the state has been in the process of developing a state wetland program plan (ETA April ). The next step will be to collaboratively work with partner agencies to prioritize the work within the plan and develop a timelineFile Size: KB.

‘Mitigation banks’ for wetland conservation: a major Washington state wetland mitigation evaluation study, Washington State Depart-ment of Ecology, Publication Number Author: Shelley Burgin. discussion of wetland mitigation and monitoring. Participants identified a universal need for more attention to monitoring wetland restoration and creation projects whether done as mitigation for permitted wetland alterations or as proactive wetland restoration or enhancement projects to benefit wildlife.Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study Phase 1: compliance.

Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No Trends and patterns Author: James Robb.Providing Wetland, Stream and Buffer Credits as compensatory mitigation for development projects in Washington State.